The New Atheist's Real Problem

Every time I listen to militant atheist Christopher Hitchens I recognize more and more that the core of his objections at theism (belief in God) spring from nothing more than moral outrage. It’s the age old problem of theodicy. Unlike the old order of atheists who objected at theism on intelligent grounds (or so they said) Hitchens is very blatant about his moral outrage at God’s performance in running the universe. It seems to color his debates. Of course he’d object at my very suggestion that he is angry at a God who does not exist. He’d consider it absurd yet this is the very basis for his outrage. It’s as simple as that. Look past his educational credentials and even his accent and you’ll find that the substance of his argument at its core is that “If there was a God he’d certainly be good and not allow evil to reign as it presently does, but since evil does reign then there must not be a God.” To Hitchens this option is most preferable than the more ghastly proposition of believing that a God exists, but that he sits idle as children are killed, women are raped and many more innocents are preyed upon on a worldwide scale. This is the sum of his argument.
Comments